Originally posted by veetee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TWL Season 13....
Collapse
X
-
i know lots of west coast american players who would enjoy getting up early on a sunday morning and lots of europeans who would enjoy staying up late on a sunday night for an amateur league!Originally posted by ToneIt is now time for the energy shift of the 7th root race to manifest on the 3D physical plane and uplift us back to 5D.Originally posted by the_paulGargle battery acid fuckfaceOriginally posted by Material GirlI tried downloading a soundcard
-
lag cheaters are not good staffersOriginally posted by veetee View PostI would apply for a staff and host few matches myself if there was AML to be played. I think recruiting other hosts wouldn't be of a greater problem either. Also, AML should be after and or before twl matches, that is either very early or late in the evening.
Comment
-
TWL is still running? wow9 TWL Titles - 5 TWLJ 3 TWLD 1 TWLB
4:Akuun> Did Neth tell u about his Sims game?
4:Nimrook> No?
4:Nethila> omfg.. i have babies with your girl in Sims!
4:Nimrook> ooo.. well i understand Neth, it's not your fault that u cannot make real ones.. cause u were born like that.. i guess u will have to make babies in your Sims game
4:Akuun> ROFL
4:Akuun> Hahahahahaha
4:Thundermare> Neth = owned
4:Nimrook> lol
3:Zell> popped boners a couple of times, couldnt aim at the cue ball
Comment
-
Why dont we have just 4 squads in TWL?
It will be even more competitive..
But I agree with people who says that there should be a max roster.
What is the point in having a squad 35 people who are just there either they dont care about TWL or just want a TWL title and sit on the bench.
Doesnt a TWLD/J squad have enough with 10 wbs and 10 javs?
So lets say they should have only 20-24 on the TWL roster.
TWLB squads should also have enough with 20-24 players if they only base.
See respect these days, roster of 40 guys who are nearly all good enough to bring competition in LB. Cuz they all want their name on the hall of fame. But then they are going to complain it was so goddamn easy to win the title. That isnt hard if you recruit everyone to your squad and make it less competitive.
So having less squads wont make it more competitive, there will be always squads who go 0-x or 1-x. Have smaller roster would help, also in twd to make it more active. Every day it is the same situation, seeing 10 sage players online who want to twd, if they were split they could twd, now they have to wait till the americans get on. Then Dice gets on and Sage is off and Dice is spamming the twd chat for games now. That happens every day..Major Crisis
Comment
-
yeah just have 4 squads in twl. That sure will be a fun season, playing a total of 3 games each...Originally posted by KneX View PostWhy dont we have just 4 squads in TWL?
It will be even more competitive..
But I agree with people who says that there should be a max roster.
What is the point in having a squad 35 people who are just there either they dont care about TWL or just want a TWL title and sit on the bench.
Doesnt a TWLD/J squad have enough with 10 wbs and 10 javs?
So lets say they should have only 20-24 on the TWL roster.
TWLB squads should also have enough with 20-24 players if they only base.
See respect these days, roster of 40 guys who are nearly all good enough to bring competition in LB. Cuz they all want their name on the hall of fame. But then they are going to complain it was so goddamn easy to win the title. That isnt hard if you recruit everyone to your squad and make it less competitive.
So having less squads wont make it more competitive, there will be always squads who go 0-x or 1-x. Have smaller roster would help, also in twd to make it more active. Every day it is the same situation, seeing 10 sage players online who want to twd, if they were split they could twd, now they have to wait till the americans get on. Then Dice gets on and Sage is off and Dice is spamming the twd chat for games now. That happens every day..
retardedRaCka> imagine standing out as a retard on subspace
RaCka> mad impressive
Comment
-
Thats what I think too...Originally posted by Jones View Postit's still terrible considering there's only 4 squads good enough for twl. 8 is a good number, although I would personally want more.
I was being sarcastic about making it to 4, since the 'pro´s' want to play only pro's.. You can never get squads who wont go 0-x or 1-x. Nothing to do with competitive but people keep 'whining' about itMajor Crisis
Comment
-
yes, but there's a difference between losing all your games 50-42 and losing all your games 50-23Originally posted by KneX View Postthere will be always squads who go 0-x or 1-x.
i don't mind having an 0-7 squad in the league as long as they aren't embarrassing themselves every weekOriginally posted by ToneIt is now time for the energy shift of the 7th root race to manifest on the 3D physical plane and uplift us back to 5D.Originally posted by the_paulGargle battery acid fuckfaceOriginally posted by Material GirlI tried downloading a soundcard
Comment
-
we used to have 16 squads... and yes the bottem few were bad... but overall the others were not... maybe only the top 4 had a chance of winning the title, but stilll
now we went down to 10, and now 8
trenchwars is dying
RaCka> imagine standing out as a retard on subspace
RaCka> mad impressive
Comment
-
ding ding dingOriginally posted by Exalt View Postwe used to have 16 squads... and yes the bottem few were bad... but overall the others were not... maybe only the top 4 had a chance of winning the title, but stilll
now we went down to 10, and now 8
trenchwars is dying
tell him what he's won
1996 Minnesota State Pooping Champion
Comment
-
^Originally posted by Salubrious View PostShould be noted that it failed because a) it interfered with TWL itself and b) because it interfered with TWL, there weren't enough hosts.
So on the off chance that someone does decide to run an AML, don't do it during TWL.
We can barely run one TWL.4:BigKing> xD
4:Best> i'm leaving chat
4:BigKing> what did i do???
4:Best> told you repeatedly you cannot use that emoji anymore
4:BigKing> ???? why though
4:Best> you're 6'4 and black...you can't use emojis like that
4:BigKing> xD
Comment
-
Actually I think they were that bad. It just didn't seem that way because instead of the 10th best squad going 0-9 and looking terrible, the 10th best squad would be 4-6, almost make the playoffs and look decent.Originally posted by Exalt View Postwe used to have 16 squads... and yes the bottem few were bad... but overall the others were not...
And it's the same way now what's the difference?Originally posted by Exalt View Postmaybe only the top 4 had a chance of winning the title
Whether you have 8, 10, 12, 16 squads, no squad would be embarrassed every week because the 16th best squad can compete with 12-15 best squads, the 12th best can compete with 8-11 best squads, 8th best squad can compete with 5-7th best squads etc...Originally posted by PH View Postyes, but there's a difference between losing all your games 50-42 and losing all your games 50-23
i don't mind having an 0-7 squad in the league as long as they aren't embarrassing themselves every week
Also Disoblige lost on average 50-35 last season (worst loss being 50-26) and by reducing the squads to 8 you've basically decided to kick them (or whatever squad is at their level next season) out. Hardly losing all games 50-23.
Comment
Channels
Collapse

Comment