IMPORTANT: TWD Reset, Rule change, Roster limit.

[Pressure]

I thought it was resetting today?

Also, we had 300 people log just for TWDT this passed weekend.

And Belg, it takes a LOT more than just signing a squad up to lead one.

Perhaps one way to aid recruitment for new squads would be to make a recruitment sub-forum for TWD? A place where squads can create a thread and have people sign up for 'try-outs' or a place where players can create a thread and say what they're looking for out of this game and out of a squad that they are looking to join. After creating this sub-forum, you can then have an hourly advert in pub such as:

"Played pub for a while now? Interested in breaking into the competitive side of Trench Wars? Look for a squad to play TWD with @ ________________________"

[PredatoR_FNM]

Sure, pub advertisement sounds good generally too.

[kthx]

oh and theres few "new" squads already; pure luck , angrybirds, dinkledoink, coverts, happytrainz, -tenure- and savenger is back..
Dunno whats the big problem? We have like 60+ squads on TWD and only 5 had too much players. If its too hard to understand we have to do something, pls dont log in TW and pls dont log in to forums.

1. New squads always start at a twd reset, notice its the same people reforming the same squads as last season with new names in some cases?

2. If only 5 squads were over the limit then how the fuck is adding a roster cap going to do anything?

3. I already paid my dues and created a squad from scratch bringing new players up to the top tier of competition in this zone.

4. You are seriously fucking retarded, Predator do you hear the kind of people who agree with your idea?

[Belgerath]

1. New squads always start at a twd reset, notice its the same people reforming the same squads as last season with new names in some cases?

2. If only 5 squads were over the limit then how the fuck is adding a roster cap going to do anything?

3. I already paid my dues and created a squad from scratch bringing new players up to the top tier of competition in this zone.

4. You are seriously fucking retarded, Predator do you hear the kind of people who agree with your idea?

1. Still new/more squads than 1month ago.
2. ofc when those squad had like 60-90 players. lets see 5x73=365players. Cap 35 -> 365/35 =10. So those 5 squads can make 10 squads.
3.blaa blaa.
4.says someone who just keeps trolling on forums. gg.

[kthx]

5 squads can make 10 squads because all 5 squads that had over 35 players had wait.. do you math much?

5x73, so on average these 5 squads had 73 players over the 35 cap?

These 5 squads had 108 players on their roster each?

Seriously you are fucking retarded.

[kthx]

Let me do the real math for you.

5 x (according to you 60-90) Which I know is a lie since I checked and some of them only had around 40-50 but lets just say each squad over 35 had.. 60 players.

Thats 5 x 25 which is actually 125, which is four new squads, but then you have to account for lets say 40 of those who are inactive, 40 of those who are newbies and won't join another squad because good players won't give them a chance and they won't have the chance to learn from quality leadership, and take out another 40 who will join one of the other however many squads who don't have 35 yet. No new squads made from this.

[Belgerath]

those 5 squad had about 300-450 players. so, if u take 350 players, put 35 to one squad ->tadaa u got 10 squad. not so hard, even to idiot troller like u.

edit: Paladen, still 35 players and axed 40+

[kthx]

I am using the math you provided belgerath, I wasn't pulling numbers out of my ass I was taking the numbers you pulled out of your ass to try to make a roster cap a good idea and actually did the real math on them.

5 squads had about 300-450 players, well 5 x 35 = 175.. I don't see 125-275 players magically appearing on "on the move" do you? If so please show me where.

[kthx]

But I do happen to see ATLEAST the last 300 people fired from squads who haven't rejoined a squad yet, so there are already 300 people that we know of if not more who aren't on a squad. Why aren't these people creating squads? Why aren't these people joining squads?

According to your math belg, the 300+ people on the free agent list on twd.org should have already created 10 new squads by now!

And thats why you are fucking retarded.

[Belgerath]

58 fired from Paladen
52 fired from Dependency
40 fired from Spiritcrushers

150.. and 150 players can make few new squads.

Then ofc Mute, Hit etc had to kick 5-15 players..

Enough for me. You can keep whining/trolling.
I wanna see how this change effects on TWD. ofc if it dont work we can allways go back to "good old times", cant we?
Dont cost anything if we try somthing new

[kthx]

Ok 150 is a far cry from the "60 to 90" and "73 from each squad" you were using earlier, again its useless none of the people axed are good enough to make their own squads.

[Belgerath]

Ok 150 is a far cry from the "60 to 90" and "73 from each squad" you were using earlier, again its useless none of the people axed are good enough to make their own squads.

Had to wrote once more.. far from 60-90? how so.. Lets take Paladen: fired 58 and still 35 on roster. 58+35=93.
Now that was all by me. Back to afk-land

[kthx]

Yes.. but you used the number 73 x 5, and you listed 3 squads who axed around 40. derp der derp.

[Belgerath]

58 fired from Paladen (+35 =93)
52 fired from Dependency (+35=87)
40 fired from Spiritcrushers (+35=75)
23 fired from Hit (+35=57)
24 fired from Mute (+35=59)
----
197 fired. (371 / 5 = 74,2)
So, top 5 squad had about 74,2 players on each squad.
Got it?
It was even more than "73x5", buhuu! My bad.

afk

[Heisman]

Both of you... Just kill yourselves. afk