TWL Season 13....

[Burnt]

a chance for them to support mid to low-tier squads and hence push them upwards? (you know, avoiding 0-x record)

It's inevitable that one squad will be the worst and will end up with 0 or 1 wins because if you're the worst, it's hard to beat even the 2nd worst team unless you get lucky. At least the top 10 warbirds would still have a spot on quake's roster and if you weren't one of the top 10 warbirds on quake I don't think you're going to much help to even the lower tier squads anyway. Really I think the roster limit of 35 is fine and lowering with it will just piss people off and have no positive effect on the competition level.

[death row]

I think it's good to have more squads in TWL. Theres always a likely chance that a struggling squad could go haywire and dissolve mid-season, reduced teams or whatever the case may be. Obviously thats where the replacement squads come in and infuse a bit more energy and intangibles. Which in my opinion, I don't see much of a problem with.

[paradise!]

Why is it one op's decision whether delectable can return or not? Shouldn't the people vote on whether they want an ex-cheater to return to playing?

Kinda stupid, the twl op can be his friend for all we know, too much power in the position of head twl op, imo.

[ignite ignite]

We already have roster limits anyway. It's called you can only tick a certain amount of people to play. Leave it at that. It's fine. No limits to prevent us squads from training in TWD we work hard to recruit the players we do and we deserve them from the hard work we put in. Stop implementing MORE RULES. More rules will not make TWL a more enjoyable experience.

[pascone]

read it again

"might be wrong in one or two, and I also might have forgot one or two."

stayon come on you know how good stray was. no need to act stupid. just cause u mad at ronaldo

there's no reason to have 10 squads. 8 is still probably too many anyway.

and as for sake, our roster was top 3. unfortunately, roster doesn't equate in results

[Stayon]

ronaldo > donovan or whoever

[pascone]

ronaldo > donovan or whoever

portual

[ignite ignite]

Why is it one op's decision whether delectable can return or not? Shouldn't the people vote on whether they want an ex-cheater to return to playing?

Kinda stupid, the twl op can be his friend for all we know, too much power in the position of head twl op, imo.

I completely agree with this. The decision to let delectable in should be a staff wide decision, not the decision of one man.

[Reaver]

\

get your facts straight, style wasn't 10-0, they lost to stray in regular season.

Actually no, we were 10-0, we lost to stray in semi's.



Also, my point remains that the past couple seasons we've had numerous people drop out or not win a single game, does that sound like a competitive league to you? The only counterargument I've seen is merely guesswork, neither you or I know entirely whether new players would just give up or try harder, I saw at least one person say above they were in this situation and they tried harder.

[Burnt]

Actually no, we were 10-0, we lost to stray in semi's.



Also, my point remains that the past couple seasons we've had numerous people drop out or not win a single game, does that sound like a competitive league to you? The only counterargument I've seen is merely guesswork, neither you or I know entirely whether new players would just give up or try harder, I saw at least one person say above they were in this situation and they tried harder.

Nope, you lost a game: http://web.archive.org/web/200801030...nSubLeagueID=1

If the format of the regular season is that every squad plays every other squad once, you could have 12, 8, 6, 4 or even 2 squads...still gonna have one squad with 0 or 1 win...Who cares if some squads drop out? Some other squad replaces them and gets some TWL experience, I don't see a problem with that.

You need the same amount of squads in each league, that tournament in TWLJ and TWLB was pretty stupid with some squads having to wait a month to play their next game. 10 squads for all leagues sounds good to me, any more than that and the season becomes too long.

If you're going to reset TWD before selecting TWL squads, it should be done soon.

Oh and update the maps please I will make them myself if someone sends me the rosters that should be there.

[Ardour]

Look,

8 squads...

right now in TWDD we have 24 squadrons. I rememeber in the past it would be like 100 squads. But things changed. we have now 24 squadrons.

8 squads = 33%

yes, 33% of the squadrons in twdd get into twll (if its 8 squadrons)

now,let's take a look at jd..

21 squadrons...

38%....


bd..

16 squadrons...

50%

.....
..............
.......................

Those are some good odds for squads!
Sadly cholerics still struggling Im a sad panda.

On topic: Maybe have a cup for all the squads not in twl. At the moment of twl drafting, Every squad that wants to, is seeded into a knockout tourny. That would be fun for all the none twl competing squads and it would guarante that every team gets the chance to do something. Would take next to nothing to organise it to.

(Taking part in the cup wont affect being asked to take part in twl later on in the season)

[ignite ignite]

Actually no, we were 10-0, we lost to stray in semi's.



Also, my point remains that the past couple seasons we've had numerous people drop out or not win a single game, does that sound like a competitive league to you? The only counterargument I've seen is merely guesswork, neither you or I know entirely whether new players would just give up or try harder, I saw at least one person say above they were in this situation and they tried harder.

http://web.archive.org/web/200801030...ubLeagueID= 1 GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT KID.

[RaCka]

whens rapidshare buying subspace?

[D1st0rt]

20 minutes

[Ricko]

should do final twd reset soonish