I somehow bothered to read the majority of the posts in this thread.
My comments:
1. This should've been TWL finals (fun reading);
2. I wonder why people keep talking about the bot which specced ease at 9/10 deaths. Why do we have a fucking referee? It's up to the referee of the game to say if something went wrong during the game or not. It shouldn't matter whether this was technically possible or not. Bots aren't sacred, don't treat them that way;
3. Pascone's example of the guy getting hit in the corner was actually interesting. Ease being able to kill someone and get subbed out while he dies on other computerscreens worldwide and thus getting subbed out with 10 deaths, looks not normal. But what would people say if Ease didn't get subbed out and just ate Chuckle's shot and survived because of that? Would that be so much different? I can understand the frustration of the people on Pirates, but I do kind of think the frustration is a bit out of proportion, whether this could or should be replayed or not. Maybe this is a bit off topic but if we can live with all the eating, the lag and being respawned multiple times into an arena surrounded by enemies (instead of some sort safe haven you can stay in for a few seconds before you get +1), I really wonder why there is so much blabla over a case like this.
4. Offtopic I guess but something that makes me wonder. What if the connection of a player dies and he gets + 1 and reaches 10 deaths while it's a close game. Does that deserve a replay? Blame the bot for giving him +1, even though the player didn't spec volunteerly? Where do we draw the line?
So, in short I don't know if there should be a replay or not. But I do doubt if this case deserves so many pages full with anger.
My comments:
1. This should've been TWL finals (fun reading);
2. I wonder why people keep talking about the bot which specced ease at 9/10 deaths. Why do we have a fucking referee? It's up to the referee of the game to say if something went wrong during the game or not. It shouldn't matter whether this was technically possible or not. Bots aren't sacred, don't treat them that way;
3. Pascone's example of the guy getting hit in the corner was actually interesting. Ease being able to kill someone and get subbed out while he dies on other computerscreens worldwide and thus getting subbed out with 10 deaths, looks not normal. But what would people say if Ease didn't get subbed out and just ate Chuckle's shot and survived because of that? Would that be so much different? I can understand the frustration of the people on Pirates, but I do kind of think the frustration is a bit out of proportion, whether this could or should be replayed or not. Maybe this is a bit off topic but if we can live with all the eating, the lag and being respawned multiple times into an arena surrounded by enemies (instead of some sort safe haven you can stay in for a few seconds before you get +1), I really wonder why there is so much blabla over a case like this.
4. Offtopic I guess but something that makes me wonder. What if the connection of a player dies and he gets + 1 and reaches 10 deaths while it's a close game. Does that deserve a replay? Blame the bot for giving him +1, even though the player didn't spec volunteerly? Where do we draw the line?
So, in short I don't know if there should be a replay or not. But I do doubt if this case deserves so many pages full with anger.
Comment