Originally posted by HeavenSent
I don't know if it's the women you're hanging around, but most of the women I know have libidos just as strong as the men I know, if not greater. And if you're referring to scientific studies, they can be considered flawed. Overall, men will typically overstate their number of sexual partners when queried.
Originally posted by HeavenSent
Originally posted by HeavenSent
To me, it's no more ridiculous than Christians believing that when they die (assuming they've lead a pious life and accepted Christ as their savior), they'll commune with their dead family members and spend eternity with their creator.
Please tell me how these two ideas are any different. To me, it seems like both sides trying to make up for the fact that humans don't like the possibility of when you die, you might just cease to exist, period. People on a whole HATE that idea. It's a normal desire to want to want to be immortal and to sustain your own life, but the stories that man makes up (and yes, MAN did indeed scribe all religious texts) are just kind of ridiculous.
All religious texts have value when you look at the moral values on a suggestive level--don't hurt your fellow man, honor your mother and father, etc etc. But again, they were written by a MAN (or men) thousands of years ago. They're fallible, just like texts written by mankind today. As long as you can seperate the good from the bad, there's lessons to be learned in almost anything put to text. The Bible is no different. Now, I know I'll have Christians saying "but the Bible IS infallible! It's the straight word of God!"--did God write the Bible with his own hands? No, he didn't, men wrote it down.
It's no different than if I claimed to talk to God in my dreams, wrote some stuff down, buried it for a couple thousand years, and people two thousand years from now dug it up and took everything I said wholesale, just because I claimed to talk to God. They won't know who I was, or what drugs I might've been on, or what the society I lived in was like--they'll simply have a text that I wrote down.
I'm not saying that religion is wrong, because again, I think that there are great lessons intertwined in the stories (all religious texts). But I am saying that literal interpretation is a bit misplaced if not just plain silly.
Comment