Forum Mafia - Shawshank Redemption - Salvation lies within

[Halp]

If you’re going with a “lynch the lurkers” approach, you’ve got a lot of options that make more sense than me. I’ve got more posts this game than at least 4 other people. I’ve called out the players I think are scum, and I have no other information to provide on this day.

Exalt , if you’re even capable of reading other people’s opinions, go back and read my posts and tell me what you disagree with? Where’s the scum slip? Or is post counting your version of scum hunting?

[Halp]

That leaves halp/PF. Neither have been committal to this game so could go either way.

I've literally been more active than you..

[field]

I've literally been more active than you..

This is verifiably false. All you gotta do is read the thread.

[Vehicle]

We're low on time. Exalt How would you feel about making it WIllby vs PartyFalcon? I'm willing to put PF ahead of WIllby, but I still am not convinced he's town.

[WillBy]

We're low on time. Exalt How would you feel about making it WIllby vs PartyFalcon? I'm willing to put PF ahead of WIllby, but I still am not convinced he's town.

Exalt doesnt have to make it between anyone. He just has the option to end the phase immedistely, without a lynch. He can declare that he wont let people lynch anyone but field or myself, then let it go through on party falcon. I'm not sure why you're asking permission...

[Vehicle]

It's less that I'm asking his permission than it is that I'm looking to see if other people agree with my scum read of him. Don't get me wrong Willby, I still think you're scum. But it seems like enough people have doubts about it that if we can collectively agree to move in a different direction it's better than my unilateral decision.

Here's the VS (I think):
Willby(4) - kassius, beast, m_leon, vehicle
M_leon(2) - scarlet, field
Halp(2) - voth, exalt
Field(1) - jessup
Beast(1) - halp
PartyFalcon(1) - zeebu

No vote: PartyFalcon

So if I come off you and go to PF it's be you on 3 and 3 other players on 2, which I don't think is helpful for us this late in the phase regardless. I don't know, maybe I'm not making any sense and that's why people keep calling me suspicious.

[field]

Lynching WillBy is a bad idea anyway you look at it.

He has role claimed, played like a townie most of the game, is active and engaged, and most importantly he's asking people questions and generating discussion (more info) for town to parse through. He's an obvious target of scum at night and [should be] a hard lynch during the day. Lynching him today means we are reducing the number of potential targets for scum (as they wouldn't want to kill anyone who is inactive/being read as scum/hasn't claimed -- they need these people to go after during the day). Why are we making their jobs easier?

[field]

Lynching PF who has posted like twice this game is a scum train. Let's lynch the one person who is not here to defend herself, suuuure. Is this really the best course of action for town?

What do you expect to learn from her flip?

[Vehicle]

Who do you suggest field? Like I said, I'm having trouble getting reads from anyone. I would also propose Voth or even Scarlet (who has gone conspicuously absent), but it seems like my reads are the opposite of other people's.

[WillBy]

Who do you suggest field? Like I said, I'm having trouble getting reads from anyone. I would also propose Voth or even Scarlet (who has gone conspicuously absent), but it seems like my reads are the opposite of other people's.

You said you read leo and beast as scummy. Why not vote leo? This pushes a double lynch, at least until someone else breaks it. But even if they dont, its 2 people you read scummy, a double win for you?

[Vehicle]

I'm not switching off of you unless there's consensus from people that aren't you (and preferably not field either).

Like I said, I don't want to create a situation where the votes are 3/2/2/2, or what you're conveniently suggesting 3/3/2/2.

I'm not that much of a pushover.

[WillBy]

I'm not switching off of you unless there's consensus from people that aren't you (and preferably not field either).

Like I said, I don't want to create a situation where the votes are 3/2/2/2, or what you're conveniently suggesting 3/3/2/2.

I'm not that much of a pushover.

I'm suggesting 3/3/2, not 4/2/2 that we currently have. And by all means, get some input from the others. But we have just under 3 hours to go, and you are refusing to vote someone that you think is scummy, and instead siding with them.

Just gonna do an Voth Exalt scarlet Zeebu

Impressions in vehicles logic here?

[Vehicle]

Siding with them? Who am I siding with? And I still think you're scum, but am willing to entertain the idea that I'm wrong.

[Voth]

I have strong reservations about any townie claiming to be "town anything" in their roleclaim, in a game of flavor. If I recall correctly, neither Kassius nor WillBy not Exalt nor Jessup did that (I could be wrong, but I don't have time right now to go back and check). I think Vehicle is fake claiming two-shot bodyguard.

When I read his claim this was my EXACT thought. My PM says nothing about "town." I obviously am not on a scum chat and have no recruitment abilities so I know I'm town, not scum or third party.

A ton to catch up on but this stuck out because I thought the exact same thing. Vehicle is scum.

[Exalt]

I personally don't prefer PF, because they don't help my process of elimination. Mleo and Halp do. If those flip red, the game should be easy to solve going forward. If they don't, then Scarlet was my next choice as scum. If I have to repost the entire sequence of events where I got this whole thought process from, I can. After I mentioned that whole thing, Scarlet disappeared too. I kind of want to resolve that.

Why is everyone against mleo/halp?