scarlet m_leonhard
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Forum Mafia - Shawshank Redemption - Salvation lies within
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Vehicle View PostOK I read through the thread and I don't have much to add.
I officially think WIllby is full of shit. Sure he lost his vote power but as scarlet rightly points out this is basically an anti-town role regardless. If we knew someone was scum, we would vote for them. There'd be no need for you to play tiddly-winks with them overnight.
While it is clear that Willby lost his vote, that in no way clears him as town. I also thing his back-and-forth with Kassius has him coming out looking worse than Kassius.
With a lack of better evidence (ie: voting field for the way he speaks to people, or PF because of his lack of activity), I'm:
Voting WIllby
you listed 2 half reasons and are treating it like a whole.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scarlet View PostWhat a cool and game-impactful post m_leonhard
Vote m_leonhard
Who do you think is scum? You briefly talked about willby's role in your last post, but never about how he's been playing or his alignment.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scarlet View PostWhat an odd role. Outside of edge cases for mylo, it seems like all it really does is add something inconvenient for kassius/wildcards to roll.
Anyway, if it's a 2shot role and it can only delete votes, what are you doing using it on anything that's not confirmed scum (i.e. ever)?
As far as I'm concerned, you've more or less claimed vanilla town. It's been partially confirmed by the mod now, but the point is that you're claiming and demonstrating that you're not e.g. the cop (or doctor, or jailkeeper).
What was your thinking in doing this? I wouldn't have said you were in any danger of lynch coming into this phase.
That's why I decided the best thing I could do with my role is make it apparent as soon as possible. I took the best shot I could think of as I was typing my PM. Anyone active/better player would be a detriment to town. Anyone worse would be marginal advantage gained. Inactive players were, in my mind, good targets because if they dont vote in the first place, nothing was lost. If scum wants to waste a night kill on me over one of the more powerful roles, go for it. But my best odds for survival (not knowing anything else about setup, my survival = town survival) are to be closer to confirmed town as opposed to unknown, unconfirmed.
Leave a comment:
-
What a cool and game-impactful post m_leonhard
Vote m_leonhard
Who do you think is scum? You briefly talked about willby's role in your last post, but never about how he's been playing or his alignment.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WillBy View PostI was googling around trying to figure out what fluoride and bad meat have to do with shawshank, and I think I found an answer for fluoride. Several games ago, kthx spent a good portion of D1 arguing about the benefits of fluoride in the water with paul. So I think this is purely *ahem* flavor here. Cant be sure on the bad meat part.
Leave a comment:
-
OK I read through the thread and I don't have much to add.
I officially think WIllby is full of shit. Sure he lost his vote power but as scarlet rightly points out this is basically an anti-town role regardless. If we knew someone was scum, we would vote for them. There'd be no need for you to play tiddly-winks with them overnight.
While it is clear that Willby lost his vote, that in no way clears him as town. I also thing his back-and-forth with Kassius has him coming out looking worse than Kassius.
With a lack of better evidence (ie: voting field for the way he speaks to people, or PF because of his lack of activity), I'm:
Voting WIllby
Leave a comment:
-
What an odd role. Outside of edge cases for mylo, it seems like all it really does is add something inconvenient for kassius/wildcards to roll.
Anyway, if it's a 2shot role and it can only delete votes, what are you doing using it on anything that's not confirmed scum (i.e. ever)?
As far as I'm concerned, you've more or less claimed vanilla town. It's been partially confirmed by the mod now, but the point is that you're claiming and demonstrating that you're not e.g. the cop (or doctor, or jailkeeper).
What was your thinking in doing this? I wouldn't have said you were in any danger of lynch coming into this phase.
IMO exalt's case on willby has at some point diverged totally from what's going on in the thread. Either he has some secret reason for doing this that he doesn't feel like sharing with the class, possibly due to quote related (below), or it's bullshit. The fact that he's yet to either: substantiate his claim that he had reason to think willby was scum D1, or justify why he didn't post it before D2 and still hasn't posted it, is always going to make me doubt the legitimacy of his until it's resolved. I'm back to reading willby as town, anyway, so I don't mind that exalt's pet lynch is probably going to stall.
Quote for context. Feels like exalt is playing the game outside the thread, which can be a scumread or a PR read, but that's neither here nor there. He claims to have a way to convince me to vote with him that he refuses to post, so until I see that he can eat shit.
Originally posted by Exalt View PostNo, it doesn't, because again, I have a strong reason to believe multiple people in this game have voting modifiers of some kind, possibly ones that could trade the ability to vote the following day with the ability to do something else.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scarlet View PostThey do where I'm from. I think someone did bring it up though because I was thinking of asking about it.
On a total aside, you're wrong about Tiger Mafia's ascetic cult leader being kill immune while ascetic Exalt; asectic is nonkill actions
Anyway, mod confirmation that willby has no vote today.
WillBy what happens if you win the flip? You get two votes, but does your target lose theirs? If yes, since you targeted PF, does that mean you thought they were scum?
Your role is strictly bad for town if you're not targeting scum, since it destroys more votes than it creates.
Whoever loses gets no vote. Nothing changes for the winner. My role is only 2 shot, I elected to use it N1 against someone I suspected (hoping to town clear me- claiming a role but saying I havent used it at all is begging for town credit but not offering any proof). The damage from a N1 failure would be minimal compared to other nights. I am suspicious of PF, she has a reason for afkness but that doesnt town clear her. I know she can be dangerous as scum, and shes relatively under the radar at the moment. If shes town, I wouldnt feel as bad as she hasnt been exceptionally active so far. In short, PF was a high value low risk target in my eyes. FWIW I was planning on abstaining, then jessup broke the flavor rule, so I planned on saving us all from jessup votes this phase. But i do trust her role claim to a degree, so I didnt want to play against someone I do believe to be townie.
Leave a comment:
-
Willby did vote exalt. He moved it to m_leo on my request because he'd said that he agreed that leo was scummy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WillBy View Post
There was no reason for me to have lied about it, but fwiw I didnt. Otherwise we would have seen a line for
m_leo(1) - WillBy
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WillBy View PostNobody is going to mention that jailkeepers dont normally prevent their target from being targeted?
On a total aside, you're wrong about Tiger Mafia's ascetic cult leader being kill immune while ascetic Exalt; asectic is nonkill actions
Anyway, mod confirmation that willby has no vote today.
WillBy what happens if you win the flip? You get two votes, but does your target lose theirs? If yes, since you targeted PF, does that mean you thought they were scum?
Your role is strictly bad for town if you're not targeting scum, since it destroys more votes than it creates.
Leave a comment:
-
Seeing as Shawshank had many scenes revolving around suicide by hanging I find it less likely bad meat means T_P died by his own hands.I assume mafia got T_P. In think scum jailed or roleblocked me to improve chances of making a kill on T_P. I suspect scum wants town to believe they were stopped making a kill and those pushing this theory early should be looked at with caution.
Also something seems off on our understanding of what a wildcard is.
It appears to me kass may have either done a roleblock/jail or in fact did get a cop pick. But I am unsure why kass feels so certain a jail or roleblock was used.. I hope kass can explain this more. So you got the cop wildcard draw and your result was fail or roleblocked or? please explain EXACTLY without copy and pasting what happened kass.
Wildcard in MAfia Universe is as follows-
Wildcard
Role Description:
The Wildcard may target someone each night and use a random power on them still left in the game, randomly selected from any other power role in the game. If there are no other power roles left in the game, then the Wildcard's action does nothing.
Notes:
I.e. the Wildcard might target Player A and unknowingly roleblock them, because the randomization caused the Wildcard to replicate a Roleblocker. The Wildcard will not know what ability was used, unless the ability is one that returns a feedback message (a Cop investigation, for example). The Wildcard will also never know which player's ability was used. Note that the Wildcard is not stealing or blocking whoever's ability is used - they are merely replicating it. This role is in some ways similar to a Schizophrenic, except this role has the potential to be informative about the remaining power roles in the game.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kthx View PostThe current phase will last until 7pm central Wednesday, June 17th
Vote count:
Willby(2) - Exalt, Kassius
Halp(2) - Voth, Scarlet
Kassius(1) - Field
Field(1) - Jessup
Beast(1) - Halp
No Votes (which is why I am slightly extending the phase) - Vehicle, Zeebu, PartyFalcon, Beast, M_Leon
m_leo(1) - WillBy
Leave a comment:
Channels
Collapse
Leave a comment: