Mafia: What a time to be alive!

[Soilderz]

Rodney:

I don't understand why you are so upset about my vote on you. You should know if anyone, that voting on someone on day 1 is simply a crapshoot, a shot in the dark if you will. We have to lynch someone. I've been that someone before and it sucks. Giving any big logical reasoning for it is close to impossible at this stage of the game.

The easy lynch for mafia day 1 would've been ixt, as he acted really suspicious and even role claimed. I played with him last game and I have a feeling he is town. Take that as you may. And apparently after my vote on you a bandwagon formed on you. No idea to switch votes anymore after that as we need someone lynched.

Unfortunately that didn't happen. Even if both you and ixt are townies I'm not sure it's a good outcome anyway as we have ZERO information and we will most likely have zero information after night 1.

I saw someone hoping our power roles will lead us day 2. That is so optimistic its ridiculous. They wont just come out and reveal what they have. We will all have to do this in the dark day 2 as well. And most likely the result will suck.

It's not looking good guys.

[Undercut]

You seem to have missed the part where he was perfectly fine lynching you

[ixt]

yeah i agree with voth on this one undercut is at least 80% scum here. he focuses on the "not voting for a lynch part" but does not focus on the parts "may be lynching a townie with a slight power". its only most likely scum who post like this, focusing on specific parts to improve their own stance.

[Undercut]

That no lynch is a bummer. I will admit, my switch off of ixt is because I was concerned that we may actually be lynching a townie with a slight power, but I did not intend to cause a no-Lynch. If unvoting ixt at the time I did would have caused a tie, I would have decided to either stay on ixt or voted Rodney instead so that there was not a no Lynch. I did think Undercut would have been a solid guess for a scum lynch, but looks like no one was interested in voting that way with me.

You had an entire day to change your vote back to a lynch after I posted. You saw me vote for ixt and could have voted for either him or rodney to force a lynch but you refused to do so even though you posted several times.

[Voth]

Damnit, not you Voth, my post was directed at Mr. Dumptruck zeebu

LOL, I noticed, but at first I was like, what in the fuck?

[the_paul]

Damnit, not you Voth, my post was directed at Mr. Dumptruck zeebu

[the_paul]

Another person who showed absolutely no interest in participating day 1 comes out of the woodworks when night phase starts. Sorry zoobo, but it?s something to keep an eye on.

[Voth]

That no lynch is a bummer. I will admit, my switch off of ixt is because I was concerned that we may actually be lynching a townie with a slight power, but I did not intend to cause a no-Lynch. If unvoting ixt at the time I did would have caused a tie, I would have decided to either stay on ixt or voted Rodney instead so that there was not a no Lynch. I did think Undercut would have been a solid guess for a scum lynch, but looks like no one was interested in voting that way with me.

I cant recall who asked me about my comments about ixt and his play style last game and this game. But the answer is that generally speaking, he is playing the same way. However, he does seem to be even more extreme with his erratic and agitated behavior this round.

Next day phase will be another tough one, barring any solid results coming out from the night phase.

[Zeebu]

I should have said something about my weekend activity, I would have pushed for the phase to be extended. As it is we wasted an opportunity since a no lynch isn?t that useful.

[Zeebu]

Sorry guys, had family in town this weekend staying with us. Weekends are tough, shoulda made more of an effort to be active

[the_paul]

I?m rereading the part of your post directed at me, and can?t see how it?s anything but a condemnation of me, but whatever works

[ixt]

But ur first paragraph seems reasonable enough so ill give u the benefit of the doubt

[ixt]

You gave people 100 reasons to vote for you. If I wanted to hide in the shadows, I would have voted for you and lynched you and nobody would have batted an eye at it. And no, the idea is not to protect myself. Contrary to popular belief, this is a team game. If one pro town stays alive, we all win. If one mafia stays alive, they all win. It's that simple, if there is something I can do to further the town cause, I'll do it, even if it puts a target on my back. Otherwise we'll just have a bunch of undercut's and BIET's in this game along with you, wouldn't that be a wild ride?

The only reason that I somewhat care if you get lynched is because you're (allegedly) at least some sort of town power role. I shouldn't have to explain that, while losing a town power role (alleged) is also bad, you made it so easy for everybody to doubt you that there would be hardly anything to learn if you turned up to be a townie.

Leave it to Rodney to post twice all day, and then come out of the woodworks right when night phase starts. Also ironic that the 2 people who would have been lynched are both pointing fingers at me, there's something else to keep an eye on. Wonder if Rodney is actually active during night phase to get his action in? Food for thought..

don't know where in my post do u consider me pointing a finger at u above undercut but if u want to take it that way its fine by me.

[the_paul]

The_paul- as mentioned by field, I also was aware of that brief statement that he said "not worth the risk if he turns pro town" if ur town oriented, why would u care if I'm wrongly lynched, defending urself is the idea isn't it? But his good side is not voting for me, creating not a tie and just simply losing a VT. but this move could be read in opposite logic...he's scared to vote for me to draw attention to himself. That's also up for debate.

You gave people 100 reasons to vote for you. If I wanted to hide in the shadows, I would have voted for you and lynched you and nobody would have batted an eye at it. And no, the idea is not to protect myself. Contrary to popular belief, this is a team game. If one pro town stays alive, we all win. If one mafia stays alive, they all win. It's that simple, if there is something I can do to further the town cause, I'll do it, even if it puts a target on my back. Otherwise we'll just have a bunch of undercut's and BIET's in this game along with you, wouldn't that be a wild ride?

The only reason that I somewhat care if you get lynched is because you're (allegedly) at least some sort of town power role. I shouldn't have to explain that, while losing a town power role (alleged) is also bad, you made it so easy for everybody to doubt you that there would be hardly anything to learn if you turned up to be a townie.

Leave it to Rodney to post twice all day, and then come out of the woodworks right when night phase starts. Also ironic that the 2 people who would have been lynched are both pointing fingers at me, there's something else to keep an eye on. Wonder if Rodney is actually active during night phase to get his action in? Food for thought..

[RoDNeY]

we allowed to talk during night? da fuk i know i havent played a tw forum mafia in a while but never had this mechanic before

We needed a lynch day 1 and now we have no leads to go off... I have my eyes on those who kept votes off to the side as to not bring attention to themselves and who contributed to this no lynch
Biet, The_Paul, Voth all guilty of this

also super sus to those who dropped their vote PAGES ago and then never returned to the conversation in an attempt to hide in the shadows, theyre aware that the more they post the more chances to accidentally slip and reveal something